Understanding the “Agent” in Agentic AI: A Game-Changer for QA Teams

June 26, 2025
Academy
Thumbnail image for a blog post titled “What QA Teams Need to Know About Agentic AI,” featuring a circuit-style AI chip, a monitor with a checkmark, and a QA engineer icon connected by arrows on a lime green and white background.

Why QA Teams Need to Understand the "Agent"

Modern QA teams face unstable test scripts, delayed releases, and brittle automation that can't keep up with rapidly evolving interfaces. Agentic AI promises to change that—not by improving scripts, but by replacing them with intelligent agents.

This post focuses not on comparing Agentic AI to traditional tools (which we’ve done here) but on clarifying what an "agent" truly is and how QA managers and engineers can practically use it to streamline testing workflows.

What Exactly Is an Agent in Agentic AI?

An agent is a goal-driven, autonomous component that performs testing tasks with human-like perception and decision-making. Unlike a scripted automation step, agents:

  • Understand goals, not just sequences
  • Interpret visual and contextual cues in real-time
  • Adapt their actions based on current UI state
  • Navigate and recover from unexpected application behavior

Agents like those in AskUI are built to operate independently of application code, enabling test coverage even in environments where traditional tools fail. Rather than locating a button by CSS selector, an agent visually identifies a "Login" button based on label text, layout position, and screen semantics—even if the DOM changes.

How Do Agents Operate in a QA Workflow?

Agents are designed to be embedded directly in QA workflows as flexible executors of user intent. Here's how that might look:

  1. Goal is set: “Log in using test user credentials.”
  2. Agent analyzes UI: Identifies username and password fields using computer vision.
  3. Agent takes action: Types credentials, clicks Login.
  4. Agent verifies result: Waits for dashboard or error message, adapts if unexpected screens appear.
  5. Agent reports outcome in test management tools or CI/CD pipeline.

These steps can be configured using structured inputs such as JSON or form-based prompts, depending on the platform.

No hardcoded selectors, no manual wait conditions, and no brittle error states.

Where Agents Fit in the QA Tech Stack

Unlike traditional tools that live in test automation silos, agents can:

  • Be embedded into CI/CD pipelines as intelligent test executors
  • Replace scripted flows in desktop, web, and virtual environments (e.g., Citrix)
  • Serve as human-in-the-loop augmentation for exploratory or manual testing

Agentic AI's Place in QA Stack

Component Agent Role
Test Management Tools Receives intent or scenario goal
Agentic AI Engine Processes goal, interprets UI, executes test
Application Under Test UI is interacted with using visual perception

Real-World Example: Citrix Test Automation with Agents

A Fortune 500 bank applied AskUI’s Agentic AI to automate their legacy Citrix applications:

  • Execution time reduced by 75%
  • Test coverage increased from 40% → 95%
  • Defect escape rate reduced by 80%

These results were achieved because the agent:

  • Didn’t require DOM or API access
  • Adapted to visual variations and latency
  • Adapted to visual variations and latency

FAQ: Practical Questions from QA Teams

How do I define goals for an agent in a CI/CD pipeline?

Some platforms support defining agent goals using structured configuration formats within pipeline automation systems.. These can trigger tasks like login tests, UI checks, or screen captures.

Can agents adapt if UI elements are repositioned or renamed?

Yes. Agents rely on visual patterns and layout context, not fixed selectors—so label changes or moved buttons don’t break them.

Are agent actions traceable and debuggable during test failures?

Absolutely. Some tools provide logs of agent actions, which may be used for debugging or reporting.

How does an agent handle flaky or non-deterministic UI behavior?

Agents assess UI readiness visually and apply fallback logic, retries, or confidence thresholds before marking a step as failed.

Can I combine agents with Playwright or Selenium?

This type of hybrid setup is not officially documented and may depend on the tool’s extensibility.

What This Means for QA Teams

Agentic AI isn’t just a faster script engine—it’s a new QA collaborator. For teams dealing with shifting interfaces, tight releases, and hybrid environments, understanding the “agent” concept helps reclaim control.

While various tools are beginning to adopt this model, platforms like AskUI have already embedded agents into real-world testing across web, desktop, and Citrix—without relying on DOM or rigid scripts.

Youyoung Seo
·
June 26, 2025
On this page